The Geography of Promise and the Paradigm of Peace

In this post, Rabbi Paul Bloom contemplates the significance of this week’s parshah in both a political and a historical context and explains its pivotal importance in the great scheme of events leading our people from slavery to possession of their promised land.

A Turning Point in the Desert

Parshat Chukkat arrives at a pivotal moment in the Torah’s narrative: the 40th year in the desert. Rashi, commenting on the sudden jump in time in Bamidbar Chapter 20, explains that the Torah skips over 37 years—years during which the first generation, who left Egypt, died in the wilderness. Now, a new generation has emerged: a nation that did not experience Egyptian slavery first-hand but instead grew up surrounded by the Clouds of Glory, sustained by the manna, and learning Torah daily from Moshe and Aharon.

This generation was not shaped by the traumas of Egypt, but by a unique existence under Hashem’s direct protection. Their mission was clear: conquer, settle, and build Eretz Yisrael. Yet before they could cross the Jordan, they had to engage with the peoples of Transjordan, and here the Torah sets down a profound precedent for Jewish conduct in war and peace.

The Geography of Promise: Transjordan’s Place in Eretz Yisrael

To appreciate these events, we must understand Transjordan’s role in Hashem’s promise. In Bereishit 15, Avraham Avinu is promised the land of ten nations. Yet, when Yehoshua leads Israel into Canaan, they conquer only seven. The three nations not conquered—Edom, Ammon, and Moav—all reside east of the Jordan. These lands are not part of the “classic” inheritance of Eretz Yisrael west of the Jordan but are included in the vision of Greater Israel described in later prophetic texts such as Yeshayahu, which foresees their inclusion in the Messianic era.

This geographic nuance becomes vital in Parshat Chukkat, as Bnei Yisrael meet these nations for the first time.

The Paradigm of Peace: Moshe’s Initiative

As Bnei Yisrael approached the territories of these warrior kings in Transjordan, Moshe Rabbeinu offered peace first. He addressed them with respect, saying “נא”—please—and requesting safe passage in exchange for peaceful coexistence, promising not to harm them or take their property. Crucially, both Rashi and the Ran point out that Hashem did not command Moshe to offer peace. This initiative came entirely from Moshe himself, establishing a Torah paradigm: when confronting potential enemies, the first step must always be to offer peace.

Yet, these nations—led by Sichon and Og—responded with hostility and war. They rejected every offer of coexistence. This refusal established a tragic pattern, one that has echoed through Jewish history and is deeply relevant today.

An Eternal Lesson: The Refusal of Peace

From Israel’s earliest wars to the modern state, we have repeatedly extended offers of peaceful coexistence, only to face rejection and violence in return. From 1948 onward, time and again, Arab leadership has refused proposals that would grant mutual recognition and peace, instead choosing war, terror, and incitement.

This dynamic is not just a historical accident—it is described in the Torah itself. The Rambam, in Hilchot Melachim (Laws of Kings, Chapter 6), codifies Moshe’s example into law: before waging war, Israel must always offer peace. But that peace comes with two basic conditions:

1. Acceptance of Jewish sovereignty in Eretz Yisrael, and
   
   
2. Commitment to the moral standards of the Seven Noahide Laws—the universal code prohibiting murder, theft, idolatry, and other fundamental crimes.

If these conditions are accepted, non-Jews can live among us as gerim toshavim, righteous residents. The Torah does not envision a racially exclusive state, but rather a Jewish homeland where those who accept its moral and political framework can live together in peace.

Conquest and the Path to Redemption

Because Moshe’s offers were rejected, wars ensued. Through these battles, Bnei Yisrael conquered Transjordan, which became the inheritance of the tribes of Reuven, Gad, and half of Menashe. These events were not incidental; they were part of Hashem’s plan, as expressed in Tehillim 136—recited every Shabbat morning—where four verses praise Hashem for striking these kings and giving their lands to Israel.

The Torah’s narrative teaches two simultaneous truths: the moral imperative to pursue peace, and the sobering reality that peace is not always accepted. This tension will persist until the Messianic era, when, as Yeshayahu foretells, even those who once opposed us will come to recognize the Jewish people as a source of blessing, and nations will beat their swords into plowshares.

Conclusion: Our Challenge Today

Parshat Chukkat, then, is more than ancient history—it is a guidebook for navigating conflict, sovereignty, and the pursuit of peace. We must always extend our hand in peace, but stand ready to defend ourselves when peace is rejected. And we must never lose hope that one day, the world will see the Jewish people not as a threat, but as partners in building a just and moral society.

May we merit to see that day soon.