Showing posts with label Tisha be'Av. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tisha be'Av. Show all posts

Monday, 4 August 2025

Ode to Zion

There is a famous kinah, penned by Rabbi Yehudah HaLevi. It’s called "Tzion Halo Tishali" (“Zion, will you not ask?”), and we recited it in shul yesterday morning following a beautiful explanatory introduction by Eli Friedwald.  A prominent part of the Tisha b'Av liturgy, it expresses the poet's deep love and longing for the Land of Israel and Jerusalem. The author, a 12th-century Spanish Jewish poet and philosopher, wrote this kinnah while yearning for a return to the Land of Israel. 

Max Stern took this kinah as his inspiration for composing a two-part Ode to Zion for violin solo, woodwind quintet and strings. Max describes this Ode as a tone poem in two parts. The opening section, “Ani Kinnor”, is the song of a bird awaiting the dawn while it poses the question “O Zion, will you not ask how your exiles are?” The second section, “Dawn”, describes the breaking forth of the light:  "Happy is he who waits to see your dawn breaking forth".

You can listen to Ode to Zion on Max’s YouTube channel here.

A year earlier, Max wrote a shorter Ode to Zion, for flute and viola, that you can listen to here.

Thursday, 31 July 2025

Of prophecy and practicality

The Talmud traces the causes for the destruction of the First and Second Temples to the spiritual failings and sins of the Jewish people. As those assessments are undoubtedly correct, they are observed in the popular view of the events to be the sole cause of these national tragedies. However, it should be obvious that failed policies, false assessments of the military and diplomatic situations of the times and a certain amount of foolhardy bravado certainly were also involved in destruction of the First and Second Commonwealths. 

In both instances the Jewish rulers pursued irrational policies, in the mistaken belief that somehow they would prevail and that Heaven would overlook their mistakes and the national sins. As is often the case in human history, when caution and good sense are substituted for emotion and personal calculations, disasters are likely to follow. 

And so it was in our first two attempts at Jewish national sovereignty in the Land of Israel. There is no escape, for good or for worse, from the consequences of national behavior and of governmental policies. Though the supernatural is always present in human affairs, no policies or strategic decisions should be made on the basis of mystical interference with the consequences of behavior and governmental policies. 

Faith in supernatural help is a basic idea in Judaism. However, Judaism teaches self-reliance, wise choices in life and in diplomacy, and a realistic and rational outlook on unfolding events and prevalent societal forces. Heaven helps the wise and astute. 

The mighty empire of Babylonia destroyed the First Temple. It did so after a rash and wholly irrational decision by the Judean king to rebel against its authority and ally himself and his small, weak country with Egypt, then the competing empire in the Middle East. This decision was opposed by the prophet Jeremiah. He warned the king and the people of the folly of this policy. No one knows what would have been the result had the king listened to Jeremiah and not taken up arms against Babylonia. But no one can deny that the decision of the king to rebel was foolish. The prophet Jeremiah was certainly more practical and wise than the monarch of his day.

One would have thought that the prophet would have invoked the power of faith over the practicality and the reality of the situation. But that was certainly not the case. The Jewish people then were simply unable to imagine that God, so to speak, would allow His own holy house to be destroyed. But the prophet warned them that they were mistaken in that belief and that disaster would follow their erroneous assessment of the situation.

One of the bitter lessons of this period in the calendar is that practicality and wisdom are necessary in order to insure Jewish national survival. Faith in God is everything in Jewish life. But the faith must be founded on the realities of the world and the circumstances of life that surround us. The same lesson is to be learned from the story of the destruction of the Second Temple. Realistically, the Jewish Commonwealth had no chance or ability to defeat the then mighty Roman Empire. The great rabbis of Israel at that time, almost to a man, opposed the war of rebellion against Rome. They foresaw defeat and disaster. The Zealots, who fomented and fought the rebellion to its ruinous conclusion, proclaimed loudly and often that somehow Heaven would bless their efforts and provide them with miraculous victory. Again, this was a disastrous miscalculation on their part. 

Again. We can never know what the Jewish story would have been like if the Zealots would not have mounted their ill-fated rebellion. But we do know that their actions led to a long and painful exile for the Jewish people. Everything is in the hands of Heaven but without the human execution and participation, the will of Heaven is never executed on this earth. 

So, the Jewish world in our time also needs a heavy dose of practicality and reality in order to translate our limitless faith into concrete achievements and goals. Abandoning the worship of false idols, of immoral behavior and wanton murder, coupled with the mitigation of baseless hatred in our community are the spiritual and emotional weapons for our redemption. 

Added to these is the requirement for hard realistic thinking, wise policies and tempered utopianism. May we all be comforted, both nationally and personally in this difficult time. 

Rabbi Berel Wein

Sunday, 27 July 2025

Tisha b’Av: My Moment of Anger

Should Tisha b'Av be just a time for sorrow and repentance for us, or is there room for more? I n this revealing piece, our member Rabbi Steven Ettinger describes the powerful feeling of anger he experienced one year when preparing forTisha b'Av--and how he dealt with it. 

In previous blog posts, I have tried not to write in the first person. Meaning, I have avoided sharing my own perspectives or reflections. However, Tishah b’Av is an intensively personal day. Yes, it is a day of national mourning. More accurately, THE day of national mourning. However, one must feel the sadness and pain personally. If one does not, our sages say that he will not merit seeing the rebuilding of the Temple and the restoration of its glory.

We are different every yea,r so we bring different baggage with us into Tisha b’Av. When we sat on the ground on Tisha b’Av 2024, after experiencing the horrors of October 2023, after visiting the homes of friends who lost loved ones either that day or during the war that followed, or simply because we ourselves had experienced what it meant to be threatened on an existential level—just like the many individual Jews and Jewish communities described in the kinot—it was very hard to control our emotions. We were not recounting history; we were a part of it. It was similar to the words we recite on Seder night – “it was as if we, ourselves were leaving Egypt.”

Rather than dwelling on last year, I want to reach back many years ago to a particular summer when I spent a great deal of time reading the kinot in the weeks leading up to Tisha b’Av and examined the historical background of the events described. Most of us (especially members of this Beit Knesset who have had the privilege of listening to Rabbi Wein’s lectures and reading his books) are likely well versed in the unfortunate fates of our forebearers at the time of the destruction of the Temples at the hands of the Babylonians and the Romans, of the massacres during the Crusades, of the Spanish Inquisition, of the pogroms in Europe and, of course the Holocaust.

As I dug deeper, there are narratives, especially from the time of the destruction of the Batei Mikdash, that describe the causes—why we as a people deserved the horrible punishment and this long period of exile. There are also hums, quiet undertones, of several themes that are there to give us some consolation: that Hashem mourns with us, that we bear responsibility but that we can take corrective action, that this suffering—this long exile—will end, and that there will be a glorious restoration and great joy.

However, the more I read, as more and more pages turned, as decades and centuries passed, as there was more and more and more death and suffering – the inevitable questions that swirled in my head (why so much death, what did we really do to deserve this, when will this end?) gave way to something very different.

My intellection curiosity and my emotional sadness was replaced with something much more visceral: I became ANGRY. I hesitate to admit this, but I actually became ANGRY at Hashem. How many of His children must die to expiate whatever sins the Jewish people

committed over 2,000 years ago? How much time must pass?

If His condition is that we must all repent or become “shomer Torah u’mitzvot,” there are two ways to look at this: On one hand, and I do not mean to be a naysayer (but let’s be realistic) it ain’t gonna happen! We are too spread out, the nature of modern society is too free, open and diverse and there is unfortunately a lack of guidance and leadership. Without Moshiach/Divine intervention, as an organic whole we are what we are. On the other hand, the glass half full side, there are likely more people studying Torah full time, more yeshivot, more batei knesset, higher standards of kashrut, etc. than any time in Jewish history—and that should count for something!

Bottom line, why are we still mourning, why are we suffering, what is the galut accomplishing, what lessons are we being taught, what more can we do? We should just throw up our hands and go on strike – perhaps all play Choni HaMe’agel—we are not going to do Tisha b’Av, we are not going to accept His judgement, we are not stepping out of our circles, until He ends this galut. We are ANGRY at Him and we are not going to take it any more.

When I hit this point, I felt a little bad (I made sure I stayed grounded in case any stray lightning bolts appeared) and headed straight to a Rav I respected (Rav Avraham Jacobowitz, who we all lovingly call Rabbi J) to ask him if I was allowed to be angry at Hashem.

Surprisingly, he told me that it was an appropriate emotion for this period of time, because I was angry on behalf of our people. He said that just like Hashem is willing to allow his name to be erased for the water of the sotah, to bring peace to a husband and wife, He can handle some anger when it is expressed as a true emotion on behalf of his people—to champion their cause.

Nevertheless, Rabbi J said, it is a Tisha b’Av emotion. On Tisha b’Av Hashem certainly has compassion for us and, kaveyachol, regrets everything that has befallen us. He knows and understands what we are feeling—very deeply. He also knows that everything that has happened has been according to His plan, just like all that will happen.

As difficult as it may be, may our sadness and anger be calmed by understanding that we are in the hands of One who shares our pain, understands it and in the proper time, will end it.

May this be the year that we see the end of this long galut, the geulah shelemah and the biat Hamashiach.

Wednesday, 14 August 2024

Aish Tukad Bekirbi: personal reflections on a Tisha be'Av Kinah

[Jeremy Phillips writes] On Tisha be'Av 5784 I was asked to prepare some comments on Aish Tukad Bekirbi, one of the better-known kinot. A couple of people wanted to discuss these comments with me and/or to get hold of a copy. This is what I said: 

My task is to introduce the 14th kinah we’re reciting today. Some of you may by now be suffering from Kinah Fatigue. Perhaps you are sitting here out of a sense of duty or respect for tradition, maybe losing attention a little bit and secretly wanting the whole thing to be over and done with. These feelings are natural. We are only human, after all. But is this what we should be feeling?

Incidentally, it’s not just Tisha be’Av and the seemingly endless kinot that we wait to end. Some of our fellow Jews here in Israel have said to me over the past few days that they just wish the Iranians would get on with their revenge attack, so that we can get it over and done with and get back to normal.  But both with kinot and with attacks from our enemies, there is no normal to get back to. Barring a miracle—for which we should be fervently praying—when we wake up tomorrow we will still be missing our Bet HaMikdash. There will still be no korbanot and our Kohanim will still be duchaning here in Rechavia and not down the road in the Ir Atikah.  Likewise, even after Iran and Hizbollah do whatever they do, if they ever do it, we will still have the same enemies and face the same problems. In each case we look forward to The Day After, but do we  have an action plan for what to do with the Day After when it comes?

My Kinah this year—Aish Tukad Bekirbi—is a very special one and I’ll soon tell you why. But first I want to say something about Tisha be’Av last year that applies to this year too. When I introduced my kinah then, I was quite critical of it.  What I was actually trying to say was that Tisha be’Av is a time of national and personal mourning for tragedies that continue to be felt, but my kinah did not move me. It was an elaborate and poetical account of the sincere feelings of someone who was not there at the time of the Churban and it seemed to me to be somehow wrong for me to recite someone else’s feelings in order to conjure up in my heart the emotions evoked by words that were appropriate for him on this day, but that did not work for for me.

We’re not always very good at showing our national grief, and I sometimes wonder if we are not even very good at feeling it. For me the ninth day of the month of Menachem Av is a day for acknowledging the pain we should be feeling in our hearts. It is not the date of the Annual General Meeting of the Jewish chapter of the Dead Poets Society. In saying this, I’ll just quote what R’ Kenigsberg said at se’udat shelishit this week: the recitation of kinot should be “an understandable and meaningful experience”.  Yes, we must ensure that the kinot are “understandable and meaningful”—but we must also make them an “experience”.  Are we experiencing the pain, the anguish, and a sense of loss and of personal failure because our generation hasn’t been able to restore the Beit HaMikdash—or are we just a bunch of comfortable old folk who are going through the motions? We must make that effort to make our recitation of the kinot as moving as the explanations that precede them.

Fortunately I do not have any problems with my kinah for this year. Aish Tukad BeKirbi, is, I believe, the epitome of what an effective and meaningful kinah should be. An anonymous kinah, it has rhyme and rhythm, it is memorable. Being built with words and phrases we know or which we can identify, it needs scarcely any explanatory commentary at all, since so many of the textual allusions are drawn from Tanach. In short, this kinah packs a punch and leaves its mark. More than that, it finishes on a positive note that leaves us on a high, with something to which we fervently look forward: the complete and triumphant return of klal Yisrael to Yerushalayim Ir HaKodesh. This is our scenario for the Day After. And we already have our plan for the Day After: to make the Beit HaMikdash a fit and proper place for the Shechinah to dwell—among us, here in Yerushalayim, the capital of a safe, secure and united Eretz Yisrael. And that is why, in so many congregations, this kinah is sung with defiance and resolution. Yes, we have to accept God’s judgement on us—but we still look forward to His ultimate redemption.

The structure of Aish Tukad BeKirbi is worthy of note. Like many other kinot and piyyutim it is arranged in acrostic fashion, with the verses being ordered from aleph to tav. Although the aleph-bet has only 22 letters, this kinah has 23 verses since it opens with two successive verses that begin with aleph. Each of the 23 verses is split into two halves of equal length. The first half ends with the words betzeti miMitzrayim, “when I went out from Egypt”. The second in contrast ends with betzeti miYerushalayim, “when I went out from Jerusalem”.  In every verse, each of the two lines is itself broken further into two rhyming segments, again both adding power to the metre of each line and making it easier to recite and remember.

The bifurcated arrangement of each stanza, setting off the exodus from Egypt with the long trek from Yerushalayim and into exile, is the reason why this kinah is so clever and so suitable for recitation: we have a Torah mitzvah of remembering the yetziat mitzrayim every day and at the seder we are charged with envisioning ourselves as though it is we who were personally leaving Egypt. In contrast, though there is no Torah mitzvah of remembering the yetziat miYerushalayim, when we recite the second half of each verse we still have the vivid imagery of Yirmeyahu’s depiction of this disaster in Megillat Eicha at the forefront of our minds. So it is not hard for us, or shouldn’t be hard for us, to see ourselves both as marching exultantly into the midbar under the leadership of Moshe Rabbenu and at the same time straggling down the mountain tracks that lead away from our once-impregnable holy city. The contrast between these two treks is actually enhanced and emphasized by the metre and balance of each verse: in stanza after stanza the pounding rhythm of each triumph, each benefit and each gain is precisely cancelled out by the symmetry of the line that follows it and hammers out our loss, our disgrace and our degradation.

I’ve one final thought to leave you with. Most of us here are, shall we say, a little bit on the elderly side. But we were not always so. Many of us, as children of the ’60s and ‘70s, have likely absorbed many messages from that era.  Here’s one that has stuck with me throughout my adult life. Some of you may recall a lyric from a Joni Mitchell number back in 1970, a song called Big Yellow Taxi. There the chorus repeats the words:

“Don’t it always seem to go
That you don’t know what you’ve got ‘till it’s gone”.

 This refrain hits the nail on the head. Aish Tukad Bekkirbi is the song of how we didn’t know what we’d got till it’s gone. We didn’t realise how good our good times were; we didn’t know how much we appreciated them, till we finally had to accept that we had lost the lot, everything. But, unlike Joni Mitchell, the anonymous author of Aish Tukad Bekirbi reminds us of God’s promise that He will never leave us destitute. In triumph we shall return! And if not this year, please God the next.

Let’s now sing this kinah together. With passion and feeling!

Quick greet, dead heat

This week’s pre-Shabbat Pirkei Avot post takes us back to Perek 4. There’s something of a conundrum at Avot 4:20, where Rabbi Matya ben Char...