Facing up to resentment

Giving his parashah shiur on Friday morning, Rabbi Wein spoke powerfully about his own personal experiences in tackling the mitzvah of lending money to others. The difficulties involved in performing this mitzvah are recognized in Shakespeare's Hamlet, where Polonius (right) advises his son Laertes (left):

            Neither a borrower nor a lender be,
            For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
            And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.

For the practising Jew, Rabbi Wein explained, lending to others is a mitzvah like any other -- and it is certainly one of the more difficult ones, not least because of the complexity of the psychology that attaches to any relationship based on loan and repayment.

This shiur, recorded on YouTube, drew the following comment from an unnamed viewer:

This was so validating. To hear we are not the only ones who've held on to the slight resentment of being taken advantage of after giving a significant so-called loan. Maybe now that I've heard this, I'll be able to fully let it go after all these years. Thank you.

Most of the Hanassi shiurim by Rabbis Wein and Kenigsberg appear on the shul’s YouTube channel, but not everyone knows that it is possible to post comments. If you enjoy our shiurim—and even if you don’t—you are all invited to share your comments.

Rabbi Wein’s shiur on borrowing and repaying loans can be accessed here.

Revelation and Legislation

Last Wednesday Rabbi Kenigsberg replaced regular speaker Rabbi Anthony Manning in the Wednesday morning program that Hanassi hosts with OU Israel. His subject? “Revelation and Legislation”—a fascinating review of the dramatic transition the Torah makes when it switches from telling the story of our people to itemising many specific rules within the code of Jewish law. 

In the time allotted to him, our rabbi set himself a steep challenge, examining the adjacent parshiyot of Yitro and Mishpatim in terms of their juxtaposition. Along the way he discussed the view of Rabbi Tzevi Yehudah Kook that we can learn from construing each parashah in the Torah together with its "pair" (in this case Yitro and Mishpatim). He also contrasted the views of Ramban and Rashi regarding the chronology of the Torah's content. Ultimately this powerful shiur forced us to consider a profound question: what, apart from literally laying down the law, does the parashah of Mishpatim teach us? 

You can watch and listen to Rabbi Kenigsberg's shiur on the OU Israel YouTube channel here.

Putting principles into practice :Mishpatim 5785

The Torah follows its exhilarating and inspirational description of the revelation at Mount Sinai with a rather dry and detailed set of various laws. It is one thing to be inspired and thus acquire great ideals—but it is quite something else to be able to transfer those ideals and inspiration into everyday life on a regular basis.

 We are all aware that the devil is in the details. It is natural to agree that one should not steal. But what is the definition of stealing or murder? Is taking something that originally did not belong to you always considered stealing? How about grabbing my neighbor’s rope and using it to save a drowning person? Is that also stealing? Is self-defense murder? Are court- imposed death penalties murder?

 How are we to deal with such complex moral issues?   This is the crux of all halacha and this week’s parsha introduces us to the intricacies of Jewish law. Without an understanding of halacha in practice, the Torah’s great ideals and inspiration are rendered almost meaningless and unachievable.

The Torah concentrates not only on great ideas but on small details too. From these minutiae spring forth the realization of the great ideals and the ability to make them of practical value and use in everyday life. Hence the intimate connection between this week’s parsha and the revelation at Mount Sinai discussed in last week’s parsha. There is a natural and necessary continuity in the narrative flow of these two parshiyot.

 I think that this idea is borne out by the famous statement of the Jewish people when asked if they wished to accept the Torah. In this week’s parsha their answer is recorded as: “We will do, and we will listen.” All commentators and the Talmud comment on the apparently reverse order of this statement. People usually listen for instructions before they “do.” But the simple answer is that the people of Israel realized that listening alone would be insufficient.  The great and holy generalities of the Torah are valid only if they are clearly defined, detailed and framed within the context of everyday activities. We have to “do” in order to be able to fully “listen” and understand the Torah’s guidance and wishes. The Talmud records that a non-Jew once told a rabbi that the Jews were a “hasty and impulsive people” in accepting the Torah without first checking out its contents. But that hastiness was actually a considered and mature understanding that the Torah could not be sustained by fine ideas alone.

 Only those who are willing to “do” and who know what to “do” will eventually appreciate intellectually and emotionally the greatness of Torah. Only then will they be able to truly “listen” and appreciate the great gift that the Lord has bestowed upon Israel – the eternal and holy Torah.

 Shabbat shalom, Rabbi Berel Wein   

Consent and Coercion

It seems strange that the Bnei Yisrael should be affirming their commitment to acceptance of the Torah yet again, having already said they would accept it--and even stranger that a midrash should teach us that there was an element of coercion in what appears to be an act of free will. But what do the words Na'aseh v'Nishma really mean? Our member Rabbi Paul Bloom offers an array of six explanations.

In parshat Yitro, which we leined last week, we learned that Bnei Yisrael stood at the foot of Har Sinai, prepared to receive the Torah. This was the pivotal moment when, having been asked to give their consent, they expressed their willingness to accept Hashem’s commandments.

In this week's parshah, Mishpatim, we encounter their famous declaration: "Na’aseh v'Nishma"—"We will do, and we will listen”—yet Chazal point out an element of coercion in this acceptance. The Midrash teaches that Hashem held Har Sinai over them like a barrel and declared, “If you do not accept the Torah, this will be your burial place.” How do we reconcile this with their seemingly voluntary acceptance of the Torah? On one hand, Bnei Yisrael willingly proclaimed their commitment; on the other hand, they were seemingly forced into it.

This moment was not just about Bnei Yisrael accepting the Torah—it was about their transformation into Am Hashem, the nation uniquely tasked with carrying Hashem’s values throughout history. To fully appreciate this, we must delve into the profound meaning behind "Na’aseh v'Nishma."

Six Interpretations of "Na’aseh v'Nishma"

1. Unconditional Commitment (Talmud, Shabbos 88a). The simplest understanding, found in the Gemara, is that Bnei Yisrael declared their commitment to fulfill Hashem’s commandments even before fully understanding them. This highlights an essential principle in Avodat Hashem: the mitzvot contain infinite depth, but performance should never be conditional on our comprehension. We begin observing mitzvot at the age of Bar/Bat Mitzvah, trusting that understanding will come with time. This concept is symbolized by putting on Tefillin Shel Yad (representing action) before Tefillin Shel Rosh (representing understanding).
   
   
2. Na’aseh for Mitzvot Aseh, Nishma for Mitzvot Lo Ta’aseh (Malbim). The Malbim explains that "Na’aseh" refers to positive mitzvot—actively performing Hashem’s will—while "Nishma" signifies our commitment to observe prohibitions and restrictions, i.e. negative mitzvot. This interpretation presents Na’aseh v'Nishma as a comprehensive acceptance of all aspects of the Torah.
   
   
3. Serving Hashem Without Ulterior Motives (Sforno). The Sforno emphasizes that Bnei Yisrael’s commitment was purely lishmo—motivated by love of Hashem rather than expectation of reward. While mitzvot bring both this-worldly and spiritual benefits, their ultimate purpose is to fulfill Hashem’s will simply because it is the truth.
   
   
4. A Desire for Continuous Revelation (Kli Yakar). According to the Kli Yakar, "Na’aseh" signified their commitment to the mitzvos they had already received, while "Nishma" expressed their eagerness to learn more. This reflects an intuitive recognition that there was still much more Torah to be revealed, and they longed to receive the entirety of Hashem’s wisdom.
   
   
5. Na’aseh as Torah Shebichtav, Nishma as Torah Sheb’al Peh (Or HaChaim, Rav Hirsch). The Or HaChaim and Rav Samson Raphael Hirsch suggest that "Na’aseh" represents acceptance of the Written Torah, while "Nishma" refers to the Oral Torah, which evolves through the interpretations of Chazal in every generation. This understanding combats the notion—espoused by reformers—that Torah Sheb’al Peh was a later human invention rather than divinely given at Sinai.
   
   
6. Two Distinct Commitments (Zohar, Beit HaLevi). The Zohar and the Beit HaLevi explain that "Na’aseh" represents a commitment to perform all mitzvot, while "Nishma" signifies a separate kabbalah—to engage in Torah lishmah, purely for its own sake. Thus Na’aseh v'Nishma embodies both action and immersion in Torah study as integral parts of Jewish life.

Why the Coercion?

If Bnei Yisrael had already accepted the Torah in multiple ways, why was coercion necessary? The Meshech Chochmah offers a profound insight: at Matan Torah, the revelation was so overwhelming that free will momentarily ceased to exist. The direct encounter with Hashem’s absolute truth left no room for doubt or choice. The world of free will was momentarily suspended. In this sense, the coercion was not a threat but a consequence of experiencing ultimate clarity.

However, after receiving the Torah, history resumed its natural state, requiring each Jew to continually reaccept the Torah in a world where free choice exists. Every time we open a sefer, we reenact Kabbalat HaTorah. Each mitzvah we perform is another expression of Na’aseh v'Nishma, reinforcing our role in carrying Hashem’s eternal wisdom forward.

May we all be zocheh to live a life imbued with the kedushah of Matan Torah and to continuously recommit ourselves to Hashem’s Torah with devotion and understanding.