Consent and Coercion

It seems strange that the Bnei Yisrael should be affirming their commitment to acceptance of the Torah yet again, having already said they would accept it--and even stranger that a midrash should teach us that there was an element of coercion in what appears to be an act of free will. But what do the words Na'aseh v'Nishma really mean? Our member Rabbi Paul Bloom offers an array of six explanations.

In parshat Yitro, which we leined last week, we learned that Bnei Yisrael stood at the foot of Har Sinai, prepared to receive the Torah. This was the pivotal moment when, having been asked to give their consent, they expressed their willingness to accept Hashem’s commandments.

In this week's parshah, Mishpatim, we encounter their famous declaration: "Na’aseh v'Nishma"—"We will do, and we will listen”—yet Chazal point out an element of coercion in this acceptance. The Midrash teaches that Hashem held Har Sinai over them like a barrel and declared, “If you do not accept the Torah, this will be your burial place.” How do we reconcile this with their seemingly voluntary acceptance of the Torah? On one hand, Bnei Yisrael willingly proclaimed their commitment; on the other hand, they were seemingly forced into it.

This moment was not just about Bnei Yisrael accepting the Torah—it was about their transformation into Am Hashem, the nation uniquely tasked with carrying Hashem’s values throughout history. To fully appreciate this, we must delve into the profound meaning behind "Na’aseh v'Nishma."

Six Interpretations of "Na’aseh v'Nishma"

1. Unconditional Commitment (Talmud, Shabbos 88a). The simplest understanding, found in the Gemara, is that Bnei Yisrael declared their commitment to fulfill Hashem’s commandments even before fully understanding them. This highlights an essential principle in Avodat Hashem: the mitzvot contain infinite depth, but performance should never be conditional on our comprehension. We begin observing mitzvot at the age of Bar/Bat Mitzvah, trusting that understanding will come with time. This concept is symbolized by putting on Tefillin Shel Yad (representing action) before Tefillin Shel Rosh (representing understanding).
   
   
2. Na’aseh for Mitzvot Aseh, Nishma for Mitzvot Lo Ta’aseh (Malbim). The Malbim explains that "Na’aseh" refers to positive mitzvot—actively performing Hashem’s will—while "Nishma" signifies our commitment to observe prohibitions and restrictions, i.e. negative mitzvot. This interpretation presents Na’aseh v'Nishma as a comprehensive acceptance of all aspects of the Torah.
   
   
3. Serving Hashem Without Ulterior Motives (Sforno). The Sforno emphasizes that Bnei Yisrael’s commitment was purely lishmo—motivated by love of Hashem rather than expectation of reward. While mitzvot bring both this-worldly and spiritual benefits, their ultimate purpose is to fulfill Hashem’s will simply because it is the truth.
   
   
4. A Desire for Continuous Revelation (Kli Yakar). According to the Kli Yakar, "Na’aseh" signified their commitment to the mitzvos they had already received, while "Nishma" expressed their eagerness to learn more. This reflects an intuitive recognition that there was still much more Torah to be revealed, and they longed to receive the entirety of Hashem’s wisdom.
   
   
5. Na’aseh as Torah Shebichtav, Nishma as Torah Sheb’al Peh (Or HaChaim, Rav Hirsch). The Or HaChaim and Rav Samson Raphael Hirsch suggest that "Na’aseh" represents acceptance of the Written Torah, while "Nishma" refers to the Oral Torah, which evolves through the interpretations of Chazal in every generation. This understanding combats the notion—espoused by reformers—that Torah Sheb’al Peh was a later human invention rather than divinely given at Sinai.
   
   
6. Two Distinct Commitments (Zohar, Beit HaLevi). The Zohar and the Beit HaLevi explain that "Na’aseh" represents a commitment to perform all mitzvot, while "Nishma" signifies a separate kabbalah—to engage in Torah lishmah, purely for its own sake. Thus Na’aseh v'Nishma embodies both action and immersion in Torah study as integral parts of Jewish life.

Why the Coercion?

If Bnei Yisrael had already accepted the Torah in multiple ways, why was coercion necessary? The Meshech Chochmah offers a profound insight: at Matan Torah, the revelation was so overwhelming that free will momentarily ceased to exist. The direct encounter with Hashem’s absolute truth left no room for doubt or choice. The world of free will was momentarily suspended. In this sense, the coercion was not a threat but a consequence of experiencing ultimate clarity.

However, after receiving the Torah, history resumed its natural state, requiring each Jew to continually reaccept the Torah in a world where free choice exists. Every time we open a sefer, we reenact Kabbalat HaTorah. Each mitzvah we perform is another expression of Na’aseh v'Nishma, reinforcing our role in carrying Hashem’s eternal wisdom forward.

May we all be zocheh to live a life imbued with the kedushah of Matan Torah and to continuously recommit ourselves to Hashem’s Torah with devotion and understanding.